I appreciated the recognition of slavery hierarchies and especially enjoyed love-hating Samuel L. Jackson's character Stephen. Black men, and women, like him existed. Field slaves, house slaves, comfort women along with other categories were a part of slavery and came with their own burdens. There were parts of the movie that I believe were meant to be funny that I didn't laugh at, but I feel the need to take into consideration Tarantino and producer Reginald Hudlin's desire to create a balance of horrifying truth and moments of levity. I don't necessarily like all of those moments, but I am saying that I understand why they exist. This film contains some raw, violent scenes depicting in many cases the milder side of terrible punishments and death. This is not fiction and for many Black Americans it hits home. Interpretations and feelings about this film are going to range the spectrum.
Django Unchained was a hybrid slavery-western where the cowboy is a black man and the bad guy is a slave owner and arguably slavery itself. The good guy gets the girl and we get a story about slavery that is not like the rest. I'm not saying it's the best that we can do, but I definitely don't think it's a bad pit stop on the way there.
Also, why in the world is Jamie Foxx not nominated for an Oscar? I'm really glad that Christopher Waltz is, but honestly Foxx was robbed of a nomination. DiCaprio was as well for that matter.
If you are interested in reading an interview with Producer Reginald Hudlin from the Root, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment